Why Off-Set, Floor-Mounted Columns Suck!

Introduction

We stack our columns on top of our boilers, here, at iStill. We don’t do side-mounted, off-set, floor-mounted columns. Many still manufacturers do. Why do they offer off-set columns and why don’t we? Let’s dive in deeper …

Why some manufacturers provide off-set column stills

The reason why still manufacturers offer off-set columns is simple. By placing the column next to the boiler, instead of on top of that boiler, the total still is lower. And lower stills fit in places with lower ceilings. There you have it: the reason for off-set columns is to allow distillers with height-restricted distilling halls to get a still anyhow.

Before we dive in at what costs off-set columns come, let’s see how they are build. A deeper dive on the engineering behind off-set column potstills, so to speak.

Engineering an off-set column still

As the liquids are brought to a boil inside the boiler, gasses are produced that – normally – would travel vertically upward. Because, in an off-set column design, the column does not sit directly above the boiler, these gasses have to be rerouted from the top of the boiler to the bottom of the off-set column. This is done via the so-called vapor return line (see picture underneath).

The vapors are presented to the off-set column just below the lowest plate, at the column entry point (see picture below), via the aforementioned vapor return line, that usually runs at the back of the column downwards. From there, the gasses travel upwards and are redistilled on the plates above.

The processed and higher proof gasses now exit the column at the column exit point, from where they are transferred to the product cooler. The now distilled spirit leaves the still at “product out”. The reflux, that is created during the refining process, exits the column at the base of that column, via the reflux return line. Please note that, for the reflux to be able to flow back to the boiler, the off-set column still needs to be raised from the floor.

Traditional, off-set column still design …

Why we do not offer off-set column stills

There are three major reasons why we do not design, produce, or sell off-set columns at iStill. They have to do with the influence this design has on:

  1. Vapor flow separation;
  2. Vapor speed acceleration and deceleration;
  3. Boil distribution and vapor production localization.

I’ll explain each of these subjects in a dedicated paragraph in the remainder of this iStill Blog post, before I finish up with how the iStill handles ‘m and then some conclusions. But first I’ll need to explain laminar vs. turbulent gas flow to you; and why this is key to an optimized still design.

Laminar vs. turbulent gas flow

Laminar gas flows are smooth and streamlined, whereas turbulent flows are irregular and chaotic. In distillation, in order to create high-quality spirits, we need to separate the right amount of heads and tails from the hearts faction. The better we control the amount of heads and tails that can smear our hearts, the higher quality our newly made spirits will be.

Heads, hearts, and tails – or any mixture of ‘m – come over at different vapor speeds. If you distill at lower vapor speeds, heads will come out first, with hardly any hearts contamination. If you distill at higher vapor speeds, tailsy alcohols and esters come over earlier. Higher vapor speeds result in more tails smearing into hearts at an earlier phase of the distillation process.

A laminar gas flow is constant, efficient, and well-organized. A turbulent gas flow is variable, inefficient, and easily mixes headsy, heartsy, and tailsy components all together, because of the vapor speed differences in that turbulent environment! An optimized still design therefore aims to create a laminar gas flow, where a sub-optimal still design creates a turbulent gas flow. An optimal still design offers stable vapor speed so that you, the craft distiller, get to decide on cuts. A sub-optimal still design offers all kinds of vapor speeds. It presents you with de facto smearing, instead of empowering you to make better spirits by controlling the amount of smearing you look for in a certain spirit!

We have now established the overall goal of still design: a great still offers the craft distiller a laminar gas flow, which results in control over smearing. We also defined what makes for a bad still design: a bad still offers the craft distiller a turbulent gas flow, that offers a predefined, high amount of smearing. With that in mind, let’s see why off-set columns suck.

Laminar vs. turbulent columns …

Vapor flow separation

Vertical lines or pipes result in a steady vapor flow upwards. But when we start to bend those lines, something weird happens: the vapor flow starts to separate from the line wall. And as flow separation sets in, turbulence is created at the corners. Vertical columns and lines allow for laminar gas flow, where bended columns or pipes or lines result in vapor turbulence. What we can learn from this? Straight pipes perform better!

Bended lines lead to vapor flow separation in the corners …

If you take another look at the traditional, off-set still design, please count the number of bends the vapors have to deal with. There are seven corners, seven turbulence creators the vapors have to deal with:

  1. The vertically rising vapors from the boiler are pulled into the vapor return line at a 90 degree corner;
  2. The now horizontally traveling vapors are directed downwards in another 90 degree corner;
  3. The now vertically descending vapors enter the column at the column entry point … horizontally;
  4. Once they get spit out from the vapor return line they bent another 90 degrees: upward in the column;
  5. After they are processed in the column, the now vertically rising vapors are pulled towards the cooler at 90 degrees;
  6. The now horizontal vapor flow is once more cornered via a 90 degree bend downwards into the cooler.

That is a total of six times 90 degrees or 540 degrees. That equals a whopping one-and-a-half spin in total! Imagine the associated turbulence that these bends create. And how that turbulence disrupts the otherwise laminar gasflow … smearing heads, hearts, and tails into one another. And that’s just with six out of the seven corners mentioned. The seventh will have to wait a bit. First, I want to dive into the influence of vapor speed acceleration and deceleration.

Vapor speed acceleration and deceleration

A pipe that’s vertical and of the same constant diameter will support equal vapor speeds throughout its design. But vapors that travel through pipes or columns of varying diameter will speed up in the narrow sections, while slowing down again at the wider parts of the design. Like this:

A straight pipe of overall equal diameter results in equal vapor speeds and laminar gasses. A pipe with bottle-necks results in a wide variety of vapor speeds, resulting in a much more turbulent gas flow.

If you take another look at the picture of the traditional, off-set still design above, how many bottle-necks do you see? How many reductions and expansions do you count. Here are six:

  1. Boiler to riser (reduction => vapor speed increase);
  2. Riser to spat ball (expansion => vapor speed decrease);
  3. Spat ball to vapor return line (reduction => vapor speed increase);
  4. Vapor return line to column (expansion => vapor speed decrease);
  5. Column to cooler (reduction => vapor speed increase).

We can count a total of six bottle-necks, where vapor speeds slow down (and increase pressure) and then speed up again (resulting in lower pressure). It is easy to see how these rapid and huge changes in vapor speeds create tremendous amounts of turbulence. And there’s just five of these events mentioned above. The sixth and final one will have to wait until we dive into boil distribution and vapor production localization, which we will do underneath. Oh, wait, first we need to look at the double pile-on effect!

Intermezzo 1: the double pile-on effect!

Remember how bends create vapor flow separation? Guess what ultra-high vapor speeds do in bends? They separate even more. Easy to imagine, if you envision racing cars trying to make a corner on the circuit that they are racing: the faster the cars go, the more will crash and not make it through the corner!

What the double pile-on effect is here? Fast moving vapors result in more vapor flow separation. It’s an easy equation. As a rule of thumb vapors that travel twice as fast, cause twice the turbulence. Let’s do some calculations!

A straight round column of 20 centimeters diameter has a surface area of 10*10*3,14 equals 314 cm2. In order not to make the calculations too complex, let’s assume the vapor speed in that column to be X km/h. Now, let’s look at what happens if we push the vapors from a 20 centimeter diameter pipe into a 2 centimeter line (for example from the riser or spat ball into the vapor return line). What do you expect? A 10 time increase of the speed inside the vapor return line? Read on to be amazed …

The surface are of the 2 centimeter diameter pipe is 1*1*3,14 equals 3,14 cm2. The pipe can handle only 1% of the throughput of the 20 centimeter column it got fed from! The speed in the pipe is therefore (leaving pressure build-up, with its own cascading effects on turbulence, outside of this picture) be 100 times higher than in the column … resulting in a 100x larger amount of turbulence AKA uncontrolled smearing!

Do you start to see why a traditional, off-set still design is sub-par? Why it underperforms? How and why it results in unwanted – because uncontrolled – smearing of heads, hearts, and tails? And how one fault can aggravate another to the extend that they reinforce one another, causing even more issues combined? Bends create turbulence. Speed variations create turbulence. High speeds and bends combined result in higher turbulences than the two contributing factors on themselves. If not, if it is not yet clear, please read this iStill Blog post again. If you do get it, please continue.

Gas trajectory in black, reflux in red, spirit produced in green, beer or wine in yellow …

Boil distribution and vapor production localization

An even distribution of the boil results in an even production of vapors over the complete surface area of the boiler. Even vapor production leads to a stable gas-bed above the liquids, from which the riser/spat ball/column (in fact: the cooler) can draw. A stable gas-bed, in other words, empowers a laminar gas flow. An unstable gas-bed results in turbulence.

Now take a look at the reflux return line on the traditional, off-set still design in the picture all the way up, at the beginning of this article. That reflux, that is returned from the column to the boiler via the reflux return line, is quite a bit cooler than the liquids in that boiler. First of all, because the reflux is higher proof than the boiler contents. Secondly, because the reflux liquid has been managed by an uninsulated copper (very conductive!) still … cooling it down even further, before it re-enters the boiler.

The problem? The colder reflux is returned to the boiler at the side. This results in the left side of the boiler contents being cooled. The consequence is that the left 25 to 30% of the boiler does no longer boil and does not produce gasses. Only the remaining 70 to 75% of the boiler (the middle and right side) produces gasses. Where do these gasses go? In an optimal design straight up into the riser or column. But that’s not the case here!

As the left side of the boiler in the above design does not produce vapors, the gas-bed above the liquids is unstable. The vapor pressure is higher in the middle and the right upper side of the boiler, than it is at the non-productive left part of the boiler, resulting in the gasses taking a turn to the left, and filling that void, before they can enter riser or column!

There you have it: there is another bend in the vapor flow (number seven!) and there is another speed differentiator (number six!). And these two are very important, because they exert a tremendous influence. Why? Because they happen in the boiler. Where the primary gasses are produced, that directly distill off the taste rich beer or wine. It’s not just the bends and speed differentials that severely hamper the ability for this still to produce high-quality spirits, it is already compromised from the get-go, from the initial evaporation cycle onwards. Another double pile-on effect? For sure! And remember: garbage gasses in equals garbage liquids out!

Intermezzo 2: how the iStill produces a laminar gas flow

The iStill is designed to provide stable vapor speeds, so that the craft distiller can decide (and control!) the amount of heads and tails smearing into his hearts faction. Allow me two examples to elaborate. A fruit brandy needs fruit forward flavors, that are heads associated. These flavors are fragile. More fragile than tails-associated flavors. The craft distiller would want to distill slowly, with low vapor speeds, so that he can perfectly control the heads faction and the amount of smearing into hearts, without having the tailsy flavors coming over too soon.

Another example about that same craft distiller that now wants to make a whisky. He wants some heads smearing to provide his whisky with a fruity front-of-mouth taste. He does want a lot of back-end flavor, that the tails provide. he will choose for a higher power setting and higher vapor speeds in order to achieve that. If he has an iStill, that is, because with a traditional still one cannot really influence vapor speeds that much.

So, how do we make sure we deliver a laminar gas flow? Let’s use what we learned above. First, we do not have bends. Gasses travel up, get cooled down via the column cooler, and are scooped out on their way down. The gasses simply ascend, until they are converted back to liquid phase, and then they fall down. Did I already mention that the iStill provides a gas trajectory without any corners? So … instead of seven turbulence creators … we have none! Instead of seven uncontrollable smearing causative agents … iStill has zero.

Speed variations? We have one instead of six for the old and traditional still design. The only speed variation we have is when gasses get sucked up into the column, from the gas-bed underneath. And as our gas-bed is non-disturbed, that’s just fine.

Does iStill have a stable gas-bed? Yes it does! The reflux that we create in the column falls back through the center of the column into the center of the boiler! And it only does so after being further rectified and heated up in the reflux capacitor, so that the reflux, as it enters the boiler, has the exact same temperature and does not disturb the boil.

A lineair column without bends or restrictions …

Gas trajectory in white, reflux in red, spirits produced in green, beer or wine in yellow …

Conclusion: why off-set, floor-mounted columns suck!

They suck because they provide seven places where vapor flow separation creates huge amounts of turbulence. Even a traditional copper column with a column mounted directly on top of the boiler would limit the number of turbulence causes to three or four, rather than seven, like the off-set model gives you.

Off-set, floor-mounted columns suck because they they have six vapor speed acceleration and deceleration zones, that – each and every one of them – are six more causes for more turbulence. And you know by now how turbulent gas flow screws up your cuts, right?

Finally, off-set columns – via their side mounted reflux return line – significantly disturb the formation of a stable gas-bed for the column to draw from. From the first evaporation onwards, the whole distillation process is already compromised as the column is fed not by a steady stream of laminar gas, but by a fluctuating and turbulent gas-bed.

Why does iStill not sell an off-set, floor-mounted column to help with height-restriction?

Because off-set, floor-mounted columns suck.

Private Distilling while Saving for your iStill!

Introduction

The easiest way to start your own brand of gin, vodka or rum? With private distilling you choose from one of the recipes of the award winning development team at iStill. You place your order and we start producing for you. Just send us your label with your own brand and let us take care of the rest. Now you can focus on building your brand and growing your business.

And there is more: you’ll be saving for your own iStill at the same time. When you are ready to open your own distillery, you can use these savings as the first downpayment on your iStill and on getting ownership over the recipe!

Step 1: Choose a recipe

We have a range of top of the bill recipes, guaranteed to win you medals in competitions. Don’t believe us? Have a look at our Hall of Fame here: https://istill.com/halloffame

Step 2: Place an order

Order your first 1000 bottles, so we can start distilling for you. Yes, you can place an order as small as 1000 bottles!

Step 3: Add a lease to your order

Is your brand taking off and are you thinking of starting your own distillery? Then add a lease to your order. With every order you place, we place at minimum a EUR 2,- fee on top of every bottle. But you can decide to go for EUR 3,- or EUR 4,- instead, as it makes you save faster.

When you are ready to order your iStill the fee is your first down payment. It’s like saving while selling. A first batch of 1000 privately distilled bottles now adds EUR 2.000,-, EUR 3.000,- or even EUR 4.000,- to your iStill savings account. A total of five batches will increase that amount to EUR 10.000,-, EUR 15.000,-, or even EUR 20.000!

Step 4: Send us your labels

The brand is yours and so is the label. Design a label to fit the bottle (we will send you the specs with your order) and we will take care of bottling and labeling.

Step 5: Receive your bottles

After six weeks we will send you the bottles, ready to go on the market. We help you out with customs and transport. Or we can bring you into contact with some of our worldwide distribution partners, like BeMakers.

Step 6: Sell and repeat

Now it’s your turn. Start your sales and become a successful brand. You are on your way to become a distiller. What’s next? Well, the future is bright!

Step 7: Add the recipe to your order

Ready to take distilling into your own hands? With your final payment we add the recipe development fee to your order. Your iStill now comes equipped with the full recipe and SOP. The recipe? It is yours now. The still is yours as well. Plug it in and start distilling your own!

THE RECIPES

GIN MEDITERRANEAN

Citrus on the nose. Two dimensional gin, with a slight kick at the end to get it just over into the third dimension. Warming, mediterranean flavors, where the juniper serves a basis for the citrus and aniseed flavors. Perfect for mixing.
Price: € 6,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 5000,-

GIN D’ARC

Juniper, coriander and hint of smoke. A three-dimensional gin with smoked tea as an ingredient. Spices and citrus are well balanced out. Perfect for sipping.
Price: € 6,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 5000,-

GIN FOREST FRUIT

Strawberries, raspberries and other red fruit mix perfectly with the lighter juniper and coriander flavors. Fresh and sweet and great for mixing. Also available as a pink gin.
Price: € 6,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 5000,-

GIN NAVY STRENGTH

Not for the faint-hearted. The combination of a high ABV and loads of juniper and heavy citrus, like tangerine and grapefruit make this a great gin for cocktails.
Price: € 7,25 per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 5000,-

VODKA SMOOTH

A very smooth vodka, distilled from wheat and buckwheat. The combination gives you an almost creamy mouth feel.
Price: € 4,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 8000,-

VODKA MEDIUM

A vodka with a little bite and a small hint of citrus at the back. This vodka is so well distilled on the iStills, there’s no need for charcoal filtering anymore.
Price: € 4,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 8000,-

VODKA RYE

A throwback to the old days of vodka making, when the grain was allowed to shine. A fully rye-based vodka with some peppery notes in the finish.
Price: € 6,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 8000,-

RUM PIRATE

White rum with a fruity first dimension and a great explosion of taste in the middle of your mouth. Perfect to drink on the rocks or used as a mixer.
Price: € 5,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 9000,-

RUM CAPTAIN ODIN

The perfect dark rum, distilled from the best molasses and matured in oak casks. To savor in it’s own, enjoying the three dimensions usually only found in rhum agricole.
Price: € 5,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 9000,-

RUM NAVY STRENGTH

The navy strength version of our Rum Pirate. At 57% ABV it will take you on a trip across the seven seas.
Price: € 8,- per bottle
Minimum additional lease fee: € 2,- per bottle
Recipe fee: € 9000,-

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Do you want to learn more about private distilling and iStill’s lease option, please reach out to Sebastiaan@iStillmail.com or Odin@iStillmail.com

http://www.iStill.com

Combat Yeast Stress via iStill’s Burst Protocol!

Introduction

Fermentation has long been frowned upon, among craft distillers. Most believed that fermentation was simply the place where your base alcohol was made. The followers of the iStill Blog know that I have made it my personal crusade to inform the industry that fermentation is not just about alcohol production, but also about flavor production. The better you control your fermentation, the better flavors you can distill into your spirits.

Today we take another step down the fermentation rabbit hole. Let’s see how deep it really is. Let’s dive in deeper and establish another level of fermentation knowledge, for even more control and even better flavors! Because that’s where you need to shine, dear craft distiller: at the production of better tasting spirits, in the understanding that better taste molecules are mostly formed during fermentation.

Fermentation science

When yeast is introduced to a mash, a liquid with fermentable sugars present, the yeast will first – as long as there’s oxygen – grow and reproduce. As oxygen levels in the mash drop, the yeast cells stop propagating and turn on their secondary metabolism: the one that turns those fermentable sugars into alcohol and where CO2 is produced as a by-product.

When fermenting in a (relatively) sealed vessel, at atmospheric conditions, like – well – in an ordinary fermenter with water-lock, CO2 is produced and partially released. This CO2 that gets released from the fermentation quickly replaces any headspace and any remaining air or oxygen above the ferment. Why? Because part of the CO2 that’s released bubbles out of the fermenting liquids. And because CO2 is heavier than air. There you have it: part of the CO2 bubbles up and is released, while another part of CO2 remains trapped inside the fermenting liquids.

The concentration levels of dissolved CO2 within the fermenting liquid are based on sugar levels, alcohol percentage, and temperature. In general, the amount of CO2 will range from ∼1.4 to 2 g/L, when brewing between 12 °C and 25 °C. Higher temperature fermentations are often the result of faster fermentations, and as fermentation is an exothermic chemical process, that creates a lot of heat, faster ferments associate with (and cause!) more CO2 production and warmer temperatures.

Chen and Gutmanis (1976) reported significant inhibition of yeast growth above ∼0.65 g/L CO2 dissolved in the media. Given the above, this makes perfect sense. As oxygen is depleted, yeast switches to its secondary metabolism, that does no longer support yeast cell growth and propagation. Instead, in this secondary survival mode, sugars are turned into alcohols, and CO2 is produced as the aforementioned by-product.

Furthermore, these researchers reported a 20% reduction in fermentation activity when CO2 concentration dissolved in the fermenting liquids reached ∼1.1 g/L. High concentrations of CO2, dissolved in the fermenting liquids, were shown to affect yeast viability and induce a general stress response. Concentrations of dissolved CO2 in the ferment were shown to impact yeast viability.

Summary

A summary? As yeast is added to the mash, it consumes oxygen and reproduces. As oxygen levels deplete, yeast switches its metabolism, where it stops reproducing, and starts producing alcohol and CO2. The level of about 0.65 g/L of dissolved CO2 seems to be the threshold where propagation stops and where alcohol production starts. All is good so far, but … as dissolved CO2 levels rise, they start to harm the yeast’s viability to produce alcohol (ethanol) as well as flavors (ester molecules). Too much CO2 harms the alcohol and flavor production of your fermentation! A level of 0.65 g/L is good, a level of 1.1 g/L is bad already to the extent that it deteriorates the yeast performance, both in terms of alcohol and flavor production, by 20%. Higher levels of dissolved CO2 will further impact yeast performance negatively.

More scientific proof of CO2-induced yeast stress

Landaud et al. (2001) studied the effect of different CO2 concentrations on the free amino nitrogen (FAN) consumption rate of yeast during fermentation. These researchers found that the FAN consumption rate of yeast was 300% faster when the CO2 concentration was reduced from 3.65 to 1.78 g/L. In laymen’s terms? Higher CO2 levels hamper the yeast’s ability to consume “food” and get access to the energy they need to get the job (of alcohol and ester production) done.

Knatchull and Slaughter (1987) reported a reduction in the absorption of branched-chain amino acids by yeast cells, resulting in a reduction of higher alcohols and esters when fermenting under high CO2 concentrations. What this means in plain English? That they found out, via scientific research, that higher levels of dissolved CO2 result in less tasty fermentations.

Problem definition

High levels of dissolved CO2 stress-out the yeast. As a result, the yeast produces lower amounts of both alcohols and esters. The consequence is that you, as a craft distiller, have a less efficient and a less effective fermentation cycle, resulting in lower and slower yield, and in less flavorsome spirits.

That is a problem. That is a BIG problem. It is a big problem, because the craft distiller’s business case depends on flavor and yield. No, the craft distiller is never going to out-produce Big Alcohol on costs per liter or production efficiency. And as this automatically results in higher production costs for craft distillers, two existential questions emerge from that conclusion:

  1. How can the craft distiller produce as efficiently as possible, to obtain the lowest possible production costs?
  2. Can craft distillers create better tasting spirits that warrant the higher price per bottle, relative to Big Alcohol?

An efficient fermentation that generates the best flavors possible is KEY to your operation. It is essential to the long term viability of the craft distilling industry. It is what gives us, craft distillers, our place in the market.

High levels of dissolved CO2 hamper the craft distiller’s alcohol production efficiency and flavor production effectivity, and are – therefore – a direct and ominous threat to your value proposition specifically, and the long-term success of the craft distilling industry in general.

Solution

iStill has invented a way for you to control the levels of dissolved CO2 during fermentation. We call it the iStill Burst Protocol. It is a piece of control, a new software patch basically, that we added to our fermenters and the iStills (that can also be used as fermenters), some time ago.

What the iStill Burst Protocol does, is that it allows you to choose short bursts of agitation at specific intervals. What the burst agitation protocol does, is that it pushes big amounts of dissolved CO2 out of solution. If you set a specific interval, this means that you release dissolved CO2 on a regular basis, constantly making sure that the yeast, your yeast, operates within its best performance window.

An example

Imagine that you want to ferment a molasse batch into a rum wine. Molasses ferments quickly, so you’ll see a lot of CO2 build-up and a warm if not hot ferment. Molasses are high in ashes and in unfermentable sugars, conditions that already induce yeast stress. High temperatures and high levels of dissolved CO2 add more stress to the yeast, potentially deteriorating your results, leading to lower yield and off-flavors in your rum wine and – later – in your rum.

Here’s an example how the iStill Burst Protocol helps:

  1. Choose a 36 hours fermentation time;
  2. Add the yeast and do not disturb the fermentation for the first 8 hours;
  3. So that yeast growth and propagation are not hampered;
  4. After 8 hours, when oxygen levels are depleted and CO2 is on the rise …
  5. Do 4 minutes iStill Burst Agitation periods every 45 minutes from then onwards;
  6. Now, during the alcohol and ester production phase …
  7. The levels of dissolved CO2 are reduced every 45 minutes …
  8. Which leads to healthier and les stressed-out yeast …
  9. Resulting in higher yield and better flavors, via a faster production of alcohols and esters!

iStill’s Burst Agitation Protocol: an amazing USP!

Our research shows that iStill’s Burst Agitation Protocol helps produce 20% more alcohols and flavors in only 60 to 80% of your normal throughput time! How’s that for lowering your production costs and improving the amount of flavor you sell per bottle?

Do you want to learn more about this amazing new innovation? Please reach out to Veronika@iStillmail.com and register for the hands-on Master Distillers Course. We still have a few spots available in April.

Do you want to order an iStill distillery or an iStill fermenter? Email me directly at Odin@iStillmail.com, so that we can plan a video call for us to discuss your plans and our amazing distilling solutions.

Choose the iStill Burst Protocol …

http://www.iStill.com

What Port and Sherry Finished Whiskies Are All About!

Introduction

Double oaked or even triple oaked, it is now the norm in so-called high-end whiskies. Port finished or sherry finished Scottish single malt whisky? How about port and sherry finished single malt whisky! Barrel aging has taken the center stage position in whisky production. The longer the whisky is aged, the more expensive the bottle becomes. And the more different barrels it sees, well, again: the more expensive that specific whisky variety becomes. Does price equal quality? Does longer aging improve the whisky? What are Port and Sherry finishes really about? Let’s dive in deeper.

The origins of single malt whisky

With the invention of the Coffey Still in the 1870’s, the mass production of cheap grain-based alcohol became a reality. But who wants to drink neutral grain alcohol, right? So, with the invention of cheap, neutral grain spirit, blending became a thing. But what to blend the neutral grain spirit with? With rough, grainy, peaty, fruity whiskies. And that’s how the current Scottish single malt whisky came to be.

Small potstill-based distilleries sprung up that made coarse product. Coarse? Yes, coarse, because big and very specific flavors were needed to blend with the grain neutral spirit and turn it into something drinkable. Drinkable as in Scottish blended whisky. The bigger the flavors of the potdistilled add-ons, the more cheap GNS could be used.

But as demand for whisky declined, starting at the world wars and continuing to drop up to about the 1970’s, these potstill-based distilleries were in trouble. Demand for their add-ons dwindled and they were, slowly but surely, pushed out of business. The big Coffey Still based producers of grain neutral spirits were not affected as much, as their industrial output was used in basically any other type of drink, from gin to liqueurs.

Time heals all wounds

As the potstill-based Scottish distilleries went out of business, one of ‘m – Glenfiddich, if I remember correctly – decided to open a barrel and have a final drink. And as they opened a barrel that had been sitting there for way, way too long, all of a sudden they realized that the coarse “ready to blend” whisky they had originally made had – over time – turned into something nice, something drinkable!

Scottish single malt whisky doesn’t go back to the 15th century. It got established in the 1960’s. On the premise that even the coarsest of products will turn into something very interesting, the industry found a new footing … and look what it brought the Scottish potstill-based distilleries today: probably the best marketed, highest rated, best protected, and most valuable part of the international drinks business.

But age also comes with disability

As a crude new make spirit ages, the tailsy bits, where the earthy and rooty tastes and that long finish can be found, recombine into something interesting and potentially delicious. Take a sip of single malt whisky, swirl it through your mouth, and then swallow it. Keep your mouth closed and feel the drink warm your mouth and then your throat. Count the seconds that you taste the whisky and be surprised that the aftertaste can linger in your throat for 20, even 30 seconds. The crude tails smearing, over time, turns into something akin to magic.

But how about the front-of-mouth tastes? How about the heads smearing and the associated fruity flavors? Fruity, heads-associated esters have a tendency to oxidize. And oxidation is a much quicker process than the recombination that takes place for the tails-associated rooty and nutty flavors. Also, the recombination of tails smearing associated flavors is an ongoing process: the longer one takes, the more recombination takes place, and the better these flavors become.

The fruity flavors, and the process of oxidation, are not so lucky. There is an optimum time for oxidation, and after that the fruity flavors start to disappear. Where a crude new make spirit can improve its third dimensional, tailsy, throaty flavors almost indefinitely, that’s not the case with first dimensional fruity flavors. The fruity flavors usually start deteriorating after 2 to 3 years of cask maturation. After 10 years of barrel aging they have all but disappeared. Leaving you with a whisky that has a second and third dimension, but that does not give off any fruity flavors in that first initial second of your tasting experience.

Sherry and Port barrels to the rescue!

And that’s where double or triple oaked finish starts to come into focus. This is why an additional year on a Port or Sherry barrel might be a good idea. Why? Because the Port and/or Sherry add fruity flavors back into the whisky.

There you have it: Port and Sherry cask finishes are a thing, because Scottish single malt whisky has a problem. Over-aging leads to higher prices, but also to diminishing front-of-mouth, fruity flavors. Port and Sherry cask finishes help reintroduce fruity flavors to old whiskies that have lost these flavors due to over-oxidation.

My opinion on the right way forward

I’d love to taste a single malt whisky that maintained its original fruity esters. For that whisky to be perfect, less tails smearing is needed. Less tails smearing leads to faster recombination of the end-of-mouth esters. Less tails smearing will create a slightly less intenste after-taste, that maybe lingers for 15 seconds instead of 20 to 30 seconds. But, combined with the original fruity flavors still being present after – for example – a barrel aging period of just 3 years instead of 20 or 25 years … the drink will become more interesting, more balanced … and way closer to how those Scottish distilleries that actually existed in the 1500’s would make their “uisge beatha”.

Or do you really think that those original Scottish distillers had a 20 year business time horizon? Or that they had access to Sherry or Port casks? Of course not. They made it, they drank it, and what they didn’t drink went into the barrel. Plain oak barrels, nothing “fancy”.

Isn’t that a tradition the Scottish single malt whisky industry should look into? Connect to? I think it should. Today’s single malt whisky has nothing to do with Scotland’s great history in spirits production. Instead, it is based on industrially produced and blended Scotch, and on marketing, a shitload of marketing, and the blending-in of Port and Sherry. Let’s replace that with a genuine “uisge beatha”, the way it was produced centuries ago:

  • Earlier tails cut to minimize the needed time for recombination;
  • Limited barrel aging;
  • So that the original fruity flavors of the whisky are maintained;
  • Single barrel aging, because who needs Port or Sherry in their whisky;
  • Focus on grain varieties with flavor instead of yield;
  • So that the second dimensional grain flavors are highlighted once again;
  • Instead of the grain flavors being overpowered by peat, Port, and Sherry.

A true Scottish single malt whisky is fermented up until 6%, instead of 8%, for 25% more flavor. It uses original, tasty grain varieties, instead of todays ones, that only focus on alcohol yield. The new make spirit is cut in such a way, that it perfectly ages out in just 3 years. More is not needed. And all that the new make spirit needs is a simple oak barrel, preferably from the UK.

http://www.iStill.com

Continuous Distillation? F*ck off!

Introduction

The big boys do it, so the small ones should follow suite? No freaking way. Continuous distillation is an industrial process, optimized for the cost-efficient production of low to medium quality spirits. It is not a technology that is suited for craft distillers, as it won’t grant them access to the same cost-efficiency gains, but it will deliver on sub-standard quality of output. Let’s dive in deeper!

Continuous distillation: the technique

The word “continuous” says it all. Continuous distillation is a technique that constantly distills. Twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week. The fermenters, where a 7 to 8% whisky beer is made over the course of about three days, directly fead the continuous distillation column and the continuous distillation column processes all the wash that fermenter has to offer. Is the fermenter empty? Then another fermenter comes online, to ensure a continuous feed to the continuous still. The now empty first fermenter is refilled with fresh mash. Yeast is added to the grain/water-mixture, so that a new batch of whisky beer can be produced.

In general, the continuous still gets fed with beer in the middle and are heated from the bottom. Alcohol purification is achieved via bubble cap or perforated plates inside the column. Grains, water, and high boiling point alcohols (tails) move down. Ethanol and low boiling point alcohols (heads) move up. Usually, multiple take-off points are fitted on the column, so that specific compositions of hearts, heads, and tails can be collected.

Continuous distillation: the problems it solves

Continuous distillation is an industrial approach to alcohol production. It is a very efficient way to produce huge amounts of middle-of-the-road quality alcohol. What’s great about it is that it knows no downtime. Contrary to pot or batch distillation, there is not refill, heat-up, clean-up, and discharge time.

Also, in a specific continuous distilling application that is called the Coffey Still, the beer is used as coolant, saving both on cooling water and pre-heating the wash prior to distillation. This double efficiency gain makes the continuous still, relative to traditional copper potstills, a very effective distillation device, that is hard to beat on production costs per liter of alcohol produced.

Continuous distillation: the problems it causes

In a pot or batch distillation technique, a boiler, that feeds the column, is filled with whisky beer. That batch of beer is processed completely. When all the alcohol is collected and strengthened by the column, the run is finished. The stillage, mostly water and spend grains and some tailsy alcohols, is cleaned out from the boiler. Fresh wash is added to the boiler. The boiler is brought to a boil again, and the cycle starts all over again.

Contrary to continuous distillation, batch distillation has a beginning, a middle, and an end. Contrary to continuous distillation, the output of batch distillation first produces heads, then hearts, then tails. As such, batch distillation is much better at separating out heads and tails than continuous distillation is. In vodka production, batch distillation creates a better, cleaner product, because the heads and tails smearing can be completely taken out, where – in continuous distillation – there’s always going to be some heads and tails present in the end product, as the column is always fed with the same beer, that simply always happens to have some heads and tails present.

But there is more. Continuous distillation, as it works from one and the same substrate all the time, gives very limited control over smearing. The above paragraph mentions that vodka made on a continuous still is less pure than batch distilled vodka. But an inherent amount of smearing is always the case in continuous distillation, and it mostly depends on the beer that’s fed into the system. In other words: when making taste rich spirits, like brandy, rum, of whisky, where the right amount of heads and tails smearing matters, continuous stills under-deliver. They have an amount of smearing that is a given, and that is very difficult to manage upwards or downwards. For that a laboratory is needed, where heads and tails can be extracted and re-assembled to create certain flavor profiles (e.g. via hydroseparation protocols in between two continuous runs). Yes, more plates can produce different outcomes, in terms of smearing, but a plate is a crude device for separation. Many, four or five at least, are needed to get to any differentiation as far as smearing is concerned. At the cost of creating a very high ABV spirit that is pretty tasteless.

Summary? Given the continuous feed of always the same product, continuous stills do not offer much control over heads and tails smearing, contrary to what batch distillation offers. Continuous distillation produces mediocre vodka and mediocre brandy, rum, and whisky efficiently.

Why continuous distillation sucks for craft distillers

Here’s why continuous distillation sucks for craft distillers:

  • Craft distillers can never outcompete Big Alcohol on cost price per liter;
  • Instead, they must compete by bringing higher-quality spirits to the market place;
  • A higher quality that makes up for the higher production costs;
  • A higher quality that can only be achieved via batch distillation, and not via continuous distillation;
  • Ah, and if you buy an iStill, you get even more control over flavor profiles;
  • While saving 75% on energy costs, relative to other, more traditional batch stills;
  • Yes, you read that correctly: iStills offer the quality of perfected batch distillation;
  • At production costs lower than even the best continuous stills offer!

If you want to make the best spirits in the world, in the most repeatable and efficient manner possible, purchase an iStill.

https://istill.com/halloffame

Distilling Top-shelf Rum is all about Vapor Speed!

Introduction

For an introduction on vapor speed, and its importance to distilling top-shelf taste-rich products, please read this first: https://istillblog.com/2024/02/07/distilling-top-shelf-whisky-is-all-about-vapor-speed/

A summary on vapor speed

Higher vapor speeds result in more heads and tails smearing. Lower vapor speeds result in less heads and tails contamination of your hearts cut. Higher vapor speed distillation result in more three-dimensional spirits, where lower vapor speed distillation runs result in less contamination and a cleaner less tasty product. In double distillation approach, potstill-style, managing vapor speed is king.

The relation between rum varieties and vapor speed

Rums can be classified in high-ester rums, medium-ester rums, and light rums. Light rums have less taste molecules. What is highlighted in a light rum is the molasse or sugar cane flavor, that sits in the middle of the run, in your hearts cut. Light rums taste of the substrate the rum is made from and not much else. The production of light rum benefits from low vapor speeds, as these allow for a good separation of heads, hearts, and tails. The lack of heads and tails contamination results in a clear sugar cane or molasses flavor. Yes, quite one-dimensional, but that’s why it is a lighter style rum.

Medium flavor rums have more flavor than light rums. There are some fruity flavors at the beginning and some rooty, nutty flavors at the back. A perfectly made medium-ester rum has as much fruity esters and rooty, nutty esters as it has substrate-related hearts flavors. Medium vapor speeds allow for more smearing of fruity flavors, and of rooty and nutty tails-associated flavors into hearts. Medium vapor speeds make great medium flavor rums.

A high-ester or heavy rum has an overdose on both fruity and rooty, nutty, and even earthy flavors. The way to get there, in a double distillation, potstill distillation protocol – as far as vapor speeds are concerned – is that you distill faster. Faster runs result in higher vapor speeds and higher vapor speeds result in more smearing of heads and tails into hearts. Yes, the product will take more time to age and to mellow out, but it will become a more interesting, three-dimensional product in the end!

On flavor intensity and vapor speed

As a generic rule about 30% of the esters – of flavor molecules – are heads associated. Only 20% of the esters in any drink are hearts associated. The remaining 50% of flavor can be found in the tails that smear into hearts.

The above knowledge creates a nice model that helps understand how much the difference in flavor intensity and length can be, when we compare the various rum categories:

  • Light rum can have up to 20 ppm of flavor molecules – that’s 20 esters per one million molecules;
  • Medium rum can have up to 60 ppm of esters – 20 heads, 20 hearts, and 20 tails associated;
  • High-ester rum has at least 100 esters per million molecules – 30 heads, 20 hearts, and 50 from tails.

Look at those numbers again, and realize that medium rum has two to three times more flavor than light rum. High-ester rum has 5 to 6 times more flavor than light rum. And all you need to make those three very distinct products from one and the same ferment … is an understanding of cut points and vapor speeds.

How to get there? How to create the rum of your choice? Well, a finishing run on a power setting of 30% allows you to cut a great light rum. Are you into medium-taste rums, then put the power between 40 and 50%. For a high-ester rum, push your iStill to 50-60% power. As an alternative method, you can also go for a wider hearts cut, as it also allows for more heads and tails smearing.

Please understand that 100 ppm rum is the minimum threshold for what I consider to be high-ester rum. Wanna go higher in taste, as far up as 300 to 600 ppm? Backset-cycling and the Maillard Reaction will get you there. Do you want to learn how these work? Purchase an iStill. It comes with our online educational facility included. We don’t just sell you the still, we also educate you to become the best craft distiller you can be.

http://www.iStill.com

Distilling Top-Shelf Whisky is All About Vapor Speed!

Introduction

Distilling top-shelf whisky in potstill mode is all about vapor speed. Better said: distilling top-shelf whisky, brandy, gin, rum and any other taste-rich spirit is all about vapor speed. To be even more precise: distilling top-shelf taste-rich spirits depends on cuts for heads, hearts, and tails, on and vapor speed. This iStill Blog post dives into vapor speed; the variable less well-known than cut points.

Today, I want to teach you on how vapor speeds influence flavor composition and on how certain pot distilled drink-categories benefit from higher, medium, or lower vapor speeds. Finally, I want you to learn more about vapor speed control. I mean, a better understanding of the importance of vapor speed is one thing, but how does one apply that knowledge into the production of higher-quality whisky, gin, rum, or brandy? Via control over vapor speeds. Let’s dive in deeper via an example!

An example

We are going to talk pot distilled whisky here, but please know that the framework presented here is just as applicable to other taste-rich, pot distilled spirit. I’ll focus on whisky to save on words.

So, here’s the example. Imagine you do a finishing run on a single malt whisky. Your cut points for heads, hearts, and tails are 81 degrees Centigrade, 94 degrees Centigrade, and 97 degrees Centigrade. You collect the heads faction until the temperature in the column is 81C. You then collect hearts until 94C. You collect tails until 97C and then stop the run.

A definition of vapor speed

In essence, a distillation device consists of three parts. A boiler, where an alcohol-rich fluid is brought to a boil. A boil that produces gasses. The riser or column that transports these gasses away from the boiler. Towards the cooler. And then, finally, the third component: the cooler. The cooler collapses the gasses back to liquid phase. Important, as we are producing alcoholic beverages, not alcoholic gasses. 🙂

So there you have it: liquids turn to gasses that turn into liquid. And as most alcohol molecules are “lighter” and have lower boiling points than water, the gasses produced by the boiler have a higher alcohol content. Thus we make alcoholic spirits. Now what about that definition of vapor speed, Odin? Almost there …

Before we get there, I want you to take in one more thing: the phase-change from liquids (in the boiler) to gasses (in the column) and back to liquid (in the cooler) is not a one-on-one change. Volume-wise amazing things happen during those phase-shifts. Gasses, when formed, hugely expand in volume. Liquids, when formed, hugely contract in volume. By no less than a factor of 100! Imagine that you distill – let’s say in a minute – a cup of liquid. That cup translates into a volume of 100 cups of vapor. As columns or risers are smaller, both in volume and diameter, than boilers, it is now easy to see that the liquid to gas phase-change results in those gasses speeding up and moving through the riser or column at relatively high speed.

The definition of vapor speed? The gas speed inside your column or riser, while you are preforming a distillation run. Now, let’s dive into the influence of vapor speed on flavor.

The influence of vapor speed on distilling

Vapor speed influences many things related to the creation of taste-rich spirits. Here is a summary:

  1. Heads smearing;
  2. Tails smearing;
  3. Water smearing.

Heads smearing and vapor speed

The heads faction consists of low boiling point alcohols and associated fruity esters. Given the statically defined cut points mentioned above (81c for heads, 93c for hearts, and 97c for tails), what happens if you distill with higher vapor speeds? The higher speeds will concentrate more of the hearts-associated ethanol in your heads cut. Do to the higher vapor speeds, hearts will bleed into heads, both contaminating the heads cut with good alcohol, and leaving more headsy alcohols and flavors behind, to be blended into your hearts cut.

Higher vapor speeds result in more headsy alcohols and fruity flavors being smeared into your hearts cut. The result? A more flavorful hearts cut, because that faction is now contaminated not just with the grain flavors that associate with hearts, but also with the fruitiness of the additional heads smearing.

Just as higher vapor speeds result in more heads smearing into hearts, lower vapor speeds result in less heads smearing into hearts. Lower vapor speeds result in a better separation of heads, where headsy alcohols and their associated fruity taste molecules stay in the heads cut and do not blend over into hearts.

As a general rule, we can conclude that faster vapor speeds result in more heads smearing into hearts. Lower vapor speeds result in less heads smearing into hearts.

Tails smearing and vapor speed

Higher vapor speeds result in the earlier selection of “heavier” or higher boiling-point alcohols coming over. High boiling-point alcohols associate with earthy, rooty, nutty flavors. High vapor speed distillation therefore results in earlier tails smearing. As a result, the hearts faction, at those higher vapor speeds, gets contaminated with more tailsy alcohols and earthy, rooty, and nutty flavors earlier.

Lower vapor speeds have the opposite effect. They allow for a better separation between the hearts and the tails faction. Less smearing and a cleaner hearts cut, where the substrate flavors of hearts are not overpowered by the rooty, nutty, and earthy flavors.

As a generic rule, we can now conclude that faster vapor speeds result in more tails smearing into hearts. Lower vapor speeds result in less and later tails smearing into hearts.

Water smearing and vapor speed

Finally, as water is a “heavier”, higher boiling-point molecule than ethanol, the alcohol most present in your hearts cut, it is important to understand that vapor speeds in your riser or column also influence the amount of water that gets smeared into your run in general, and into your hearts cut specifically.

Contrary to heads and tails smearing, water has no flavor. But higher or lower vapor speeds still have an influence. In potstill runs, higher vapor speeds result in more water coming over. Lower vapor speeds result in less water smearing. In plain English? Higher vapor speeds result in lower ABV output.

What vapor speeds are ideal for whisky?

I define whisky as a three-dimensional drink, where the substrate that it is made from can be identified. This means that all three flavor boxes need to be ticked off. Whisky needs to have a fruity beginning, a middle where one tastes the grain, and a long finish with earthy, rooty, and nutty flavors. In order to get the right amount of smearing, higher vapor speeds are needed to produce interesting whiskies.

Vapor speed control

In general, whisky is distilled on a potstill with a relatively slender riser or column. The small diameter results in higher vapor speeds. The higher vapor speeds enable the smearing of heads and tails into hearts.

Given your set-up is what it is, another approach to improved whisky distillation is that you distill faster. Push the power that goes into the boil upwards, so that you create more gasses that need to travel through the same column or riser … resulting in higher vapor speeds and more smearing.

Or simply purchase an iStill, as it is the only still with a fully optimized design for vapor speed control. Yeah, that’s the tool you need if you want to produce top-shelf flavor-rich spirits. The iStill Hybrid even allows you to make whisky in one single go in column mode … for even more taste! More on that in a later post.

http://www.iStill.com

iStill Nano Business Case!

What is the iStill Nano?

The iStill Nano is a small, one liter big still. It distills half a liter of gin in like an hour. It comes with a power manager, a hotplate, our bluetooth thermometer, and the StillControl App. Making a bottle of spirit has never been easier!

How can this help your business?

We designed the iStill Nano so that your visitors and customers, the people that visit your distillery, can add a guided distillation run to their guided tour of your facility. This hugely enhances the customer’s experience. He gets to create and distill his own spirit!

Usually a tour like this takes two hours. In the first hour, the craft distiller presents his distillery, his philosophy, his story, and his products. In the second hour, under the craft distiller’s guidance, the visitors produce their own spirit.

We produce the iStills Nano in sets of six. Your distillery’s name or logo can be added to the little stills. The feedback we get, is that visitors love this in-depth experience of being a bit of a distiller themselves. It creates happy customers, that you have now basically turned into brand ambassadors, and it creates a lot of additional revenue.

Business case numbers

A simple business case of adding a gin or rum or whiskey school to your craft distillery? Here you go. With a set of six iStills Nano, you should be able to do two tours a day. Each tour serves six visitors. That’s 12 visitors per day. People are easily paying up to EUR 100,- per participation, so the 12 visitors result in a daily revenue of EUR 1.200,-. As a rule of thumb, the participants also purchase a bottle of your spirit and a T-shirt, adding another EUR 600,- to your daily revenue.

The above simple business case results in EUR 1.800,- of revenue per day. On 200 days per year, the set of six iStills Nano result in EUR 360.000,- additional revenue annually! That … and you created close to 200 additional brand ambassadors; people that will speak highly of your distillery and will urge others to visit and spend money with you.

A more elaborate business case? What if you are a distiller in a very touristy place. What if you invest in 12 iStills Nano and do three or four tours per day? The math? You are the entrepreneur, so please do the math yourself. And when you are done, reach out to me via Odin@iStillmail.com and place an order ASAP.

http://www.iStill.com